Hardship Funds: Disadvantage Recognised, but not always Factored In

In What Lies Beneath a Hardship Fund Application, we looked at how one institution's hardship support have evolved over time. Here we explore, when the sector recognises a new group of vulnerable students, does that recognition actually change who a hardship fund helps or is the need responded to somewhere else entirely?

Tracing the history suggests a recurring pattern, and it has real implications for the group currently bringing that question into particularly sharp focus.

A potted history of who the fund was built for

The Access to Learning Fund, introduced by the government in 2004, replaced existing university hardship funds and identified a limited set of priority groups: disabled students, care experienced students, lone parents, and final-year students. The ALF framework left a lasting imprint on the way hardship support has been assessed. Although the national fund itself disappeared in 2014, elements of that framework are still recognisable in many hardship fund criteria today, more than two decades on.

Estranged students subsequently became much more visible in higher education policy as a group requiring additional support, recognition of a group whose need is, in many ways, as acute as a care leaver's. But look closely at how that need actually gets met in practice, and a pattern starts to emerge.

Recognised, and factored in outside Hardship provision

🐝 Care leavers and estranged students are formally part of most institutions' “vulnerable groups” list. In practice, their extra need has increasingly been addressed through separate, dedicated bursaries and targeted support schemes, rather than through the hardship fund's own criteria stretching to cover them.

🐝 Young carers followed a similar path, identified as needing support, but that identification has typically happened through widening participation (WP) initiatives and outreach, not necessarily through an expanded hardship fund category.

🐝 First in family emerged as a recognised issue later still. Again, the response from universities for example Manchester Met, where targeted funding and support was introduced, was to build something new alongside the hardship fund, not to fold the group into its existing criteria.

🐝 Ethnicity and religion follow the same pattern almost exactly. Both are actively addressed through widening participation initiatives across the sector. Neither typically features as an extra layer of need within a hardship fund assessment itself.

The pattern: recognition without a route in

Put the history together and a clear shape emerges. The sector has repeatedly recognised new groups of vulnerable students. Almost none of that recognition has changed the hardship fund's own core criteria. Instead, each newly recognised group has been met with a parallel structure, a dedicated bursary, a WP programme, an outreach scheme, built alongside the fund rather than into it.

What's stayed in the hardship fund's own criteria, what's been routed to parallel schemes instead, and what has no route in yet.

That's not necessarily a bad system. A dedicated, well-resourced bursary can serve a group better than a generic hardship top-up ever could. But it does mean the hardship fund's own criteria can look frozen in 2004 while the sector's overall response to student need has genuinely moved. The Hardship Fund isn't the whole picture, it never was. The question worth asking is what happens to a group the sector recognises but doesn't yet appear to make provision for?

One striking current gap: white working-class boys

Government guidance named this group explicitly nearly a decade ago. In 2016, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills called on universities to focus outreach on white boys from the poorest homes, alongside other underrepresented groups. The recognition itself, therefore, isn't new. The question is what happened after the recognition?

What's changed is how visible the absence of a funded response has become. 

In June 2026, an Independent Inquiry into White Working Class Educational Outcomes reported significant disparities in GCSE English and maths outcomes for white British pupils eligible for free school meals compared with pupils who were not eligible. The Centre for Social Justice's Lost Boys research similarly identifies white working-class pupils eligible for free school meals as having particularly poor outcomes.

An analysis reported by The Telegraph in June 2026 identified at least 15 Oxford and Cambridge scholarships, bursaries and financial-aid schemes aimed specifically at students from BAME backgrounds, while identifying only one such scheme for which white working-class men appeared to be eligible and two for white working-class women.

A contested framing, worth separating from the numbers Some politicians, including Suella Braverman and Laura Trott, have characterised the scheme-count gap as evidence of a “two-tier” system. That is a political interpretation of the figures, rather than an established finding of the analysis, and this post does not take a position on it.

Whichever framing you take from the politics, the underlying pattern is the same. For care leavers, estranged students, young carers and first-in-family students, that gap eventually got filled by something ~ a bursary, a scheme, a targeted budgeted support. For white working-class boys, a decade on from the guidance that named them, that something still doesn't appear to exist in any consistent way.

So, are Hardship Funds still stuck in the past?

Not quite, a more precise version of the criticism is more useful than the blunt one. While hardship fund's own criteria have generally stayed close to its 2004 shape, this may be because the sector's mechanism for responding to newly recognised need, has  been to introduce something other than a tweak to the fund itself. For groups with an active outreach infrastructure and dedicated funding behind them, the need may therefore be addressed somewhere, even if it isn't addressed through the hardship fund itself.

Perhaps the better question isn't whether hardship funds are ‘stuck in the past’. It is whether the sector has developed a recurring habit of responding to newly recognised disadvantage by building something alongside the hardship fund, rather than changing the fund itself.

A decade on from their disadvantage being flagged, for white working-class boys, there does not appear to be a consistently available national pattern of targeted university financial support. 

This matters because hardship assessment is ultimately about the individual student's circumstances and whether there is a financial shortfall that could affect their ability to remain in study. Priority groups can help universities identify particular forms of disadvantage, but they do not necessarily capture every student whose circumstances create financial need.

A decade on from their disadvantage being flagged, there does not appear to be a consistently available national pattern of targeted university financial support for white working-class boys. 

So, should hardship funds step in to respond to their disadvantage, in the absence of an alternative?

If you're a student who doesn't obviously fit any of the established categories mentioned above, our guidance is to ask your university's Student Money Advice/Support service whether your circumstances can be considered and what funding or other support exists to help you.

This is a developing and, in places, politically contested topic, figures and framing may change as further reporting and data emerge. Hardship fund and bursary criteria vary by institution: always check your own university's current schemes rather than relying on the general pattern described here.

Sources:

https://www.educationopportunities.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Working-Class-Heroes-Understanding-access-to-higher-education-for-white-students-from-lower-socio-economic-backgrounds-1.pdf

https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2024/03/11/our-problem-not-theirs-young-white-working-class-males-and-higher-education/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/30/white-working-class-students-excluded-oxbridge-diversity-uk/

https://educationaloutcomes.org.uk/

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/lost-boys 

https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/newsroom/white-working-class-boys-still-at-the-bottom-of-the-class-says-race-report-chief  

Hardship Funds: What Lies Beneath a Hardship Fund Application

In our post comparing student finance across the UK's four nations, we mentioned a second, discretionary layer sitting underneath the national systems: university hardship funds (or support funds). If your student finance entitlement leaves you struggling, this is often the place to turn but how these funds work, who they're built to support, and what you can do if you don't fit the obvious categories, is rarely explained anywhere a student would actually find it. So here it is.

Where Hardship Funds Came From

Most UK universities' "hardship" schemes still trace their shape back to the Access to Learning Fund (ALF), introduced in 2004 to give institutions “simpler and more transparent arrangements for students in financial difficulty” following the Higher Education Act 2004 and the introduction of variable tuition fees. While funds pre-dated this, ALF was centrally funded, administered via the now closed Higher Education Funding Council for England and ran for a decade.

In 2014, that funding was withdrawn, and institutions were left to design and fund their own provision. Most continued to use some version of the former ALF guidance rather than start from scratch. This guidance that has since been curated and kept current by the National Association of Student MoneyAdvisers (NASMA), a professional body supporting the vital work of university money advice and support staff.

What that history means in practice: a lot of hardship/support fund criteria in use today still, at its root, is a snapshot of who the sector considered vulnerable in the mid-2000s, lone parents, disabled students, care leavers, estranged students. Those categories are still absolutely relevant today. But most were fixed before £9,000 fees, before undergraduate participation passed half of all 18-year-olds, and before BTECs became a mainstream entry route. Nobody centrally re-tested that priority list against what today's progression and attainment data actually shows.

An evidence-based approach?

Institutions can now set their own criteria and priorities for targeting funding, free to follow or tweak the existing guidance or redesign their own policies.

So, how many institutions still prioritise the groups identified back in 2004 and how may try to incorperate more recent evidence regarding which students face challenges with access, progression, retention and success?

Additional layers of disadvantage emerged and then changed over time including BAME students*, students who had entered via BTECs, part-time students, commuting students and mature students (aged 25 and over). Each of those had a published evidence base showing worse continuation or attainment outcomes for that group. 

The Office for Students (OFS) formalised exactly this kind of thinking into the Equality of Opportunity Risk Register (EORR), introduced via consultation in late 2022 and now embedded in how providers write their Access and Participation Plans.

The EORR lists 12 sector-wide risks (knowledge and skills, information and guidance, mental health, cost pressures etc) and separately the specific student characteristics most likely to indicate risk of those 12. Here's OfS's current full student charateristics list.

We will perhaps return to the topic of whether these priority groups are reflected in the Hardship Fund criteria of whther the needs are addressed elsewhere in a future post.

Hardship Support is discretionary, not an entitlement

However a fund's criteria is designed, the fundamental nature of hardship funding hasn't changed: it's discretionary, not a right. You have to apply, demonstrate need, and there's no guaranteed award or amount, unlike the Tuition Fee Loan or Maintenance Loan, which you're entitled to if you meet the qualifying conditions. 

It's also worth knowing that, in practice (unless tweaked), the funds can end up disproportionately topping up the incomes of students from nations whose baseline national entitlement is lower, Northern Ireland and Scotland, for students studying in England for example. 

Applying to the Hardship Funds

●   If your budget feels tight, you're struggling, or facing a money pressure  then ask your university what hardship or discretionary funding they offer, who is eliible to apply and how it's assessed.

●   Apply early as funds are limited and can become depleted and even run out.

●   Apply before you're in crisis, not after. The fund assesments take time and are not intended to respond to emergency situations. 

●   Provide evidence to support your application, don't just say the government doesnt give me enough money! The university can't change that, and while it won't change things here and now you could write to your MP and complain ~ They Work For You 

●   If you're refused Hardship Support, receive no award or less than you hoped for you can ask why and explore what further evidence, reassessment or appeal routes exists if you don't agree with the outcome. Discretionary doesn't mean unaccountable, staff should be able to explain their decision to you.

●   Not all funds are the same across each institution but many still have their roots in the Access to Learning Fund of old. Beware not all students will be assessed in the same way, for example part-time or postgraduate students. However the illustration below indicates how a full-time undergraduate might be assessed. 

An example of a process when a full-time undergraduate student applies to a university Hardship Fund (for illustration purposes only, check the process that applies where you study).

Hardship fund criteria, names and application processes vary by institution and change over time. Always check your own university's current scheme rather than relying on the general description in this post. For background on the Access to Learning Fund and the Higher Education Act 2004, see legislation.gov.uk. For current sector guidance on student money advice, see NASMA. If you're struggling financially, speak to your university's Student Support/Advice Service as early as possible.

*Read about the change in stance regarding the term BAME (Black Asian Minority Ethnic ) 

Four students. Four funding systems. One cost of living

You might think that if four students walk through the doors of the same university, they'll all be getting roughly the same help with the cost of being a student.

They won't.

Where you are ordinarily resident, not where you choose to study, determines which of the UK's four student finance agencies deals with your application.

So imagine four students starting the same undergraduate course at the same English university this September.

Image made with AI

.

Alex is from Leeds

   Aisha is from Cardiff.

Callum is from Glasgow.

Dayo is from Belfast.

Same lecture theatre. Same library. Same supermarkets. Same rent. But potentially four different funding packages......... and four different repayment systems when they graduate.

🐝 Our four students

To keep this genuinely like-for-like, let's give our four students exactly the same circumstances.

• 18-year old school/college leavers
• starting a standard full-time undergraduate course
• studying at an English university
• living away from home, outside London
• without dependants
• without a disability
• not part of a couple
• from households with an income of £25,000

The only thing we're changing is where they're ordinarily resident or domiciled. That matters because the four nations have developed four different student finance systems and, as you'll see, the differences aren't small.

The headline comparison

	Student Finance England	Student Finance Wales	SAAS Scotland	Student Finance NI
Tuition Fee Loan	£9,790	£9,790	Up to £9,790*	£9,790
Living-cost support	£10,830	£12,590	£9,900	£9,034
Non-repayable element	£0	£7,085 (grant)	£500 (bursary)	£2,261 (grant)
Total shown	£20,620	£22,380	£19,690	£18,824

Figures are for 2026/27 and all four students are assessed at the same £25,000 household income.

*For a Scottish-domiciled student studying in England, SAAS tuition support is provided as a loan, up to the applicable English fee level. Free tuition in Scotland only applies to eligible Scottish-domiciled students studying at Scottish institutions.

So what actually stands out?

England

Our English student gets £10,830 towards living costs. At this income level, that's the same amount whether household income is £0 or £25,000. There's no non-repayable grant in this particular example. The maintenance support is essentially all borrowing.

Wales

Our Welsh student receives £12,590 in living-cost support — and £7,085 of that is a grant rather than a loan. The balance between grant and loan changes as household income changes.

Scotland

Our Scottish student gets £9,900 living-cost support in this example, including a £500 bursary. SAAS doesn't use the same location-based maintenance rates as England and Wales. But if they choose to study in England, their tuition support isn't suddenly free.

Northern Ireland

Our Northern Irish student receives £9,034 towards living costs, including a £2,261 grant. As household income rises, the combined grant and loan support falls because the increase in borrowing doesn't fully compensate for the reduction in grant.

What about the rent?

Here's where the neat little table above meets real life.

Because rent doesn't care which student finance system you're on.

If all four students are paying the equivalent £200 a week for accommodation on a 43 week contract, so they need to budget £8,600 a year before they've bought a single tin of beans.

This is not an average rent but simply an illustration of what happens when you put a rent bill against a maintenance package.

	Living-cost support	£200 × 43 weeks rent	Left for everything else*
England	£10,830	£8,600	£2,230
Wales	£12,590	£8,600	£3,990
Scotland	£9,900	£8,600	£1,300
Northern Ireland	£9,034	£8,600	£434

*Illustration only. Actual accommodation costs vary enormously.

And that's the bit that can get lost when people talk about a maintenance loan as though it is disposable income. It isn't. For a student paying substantial rent, a very large chunk can disappear immediately before food, travel, books, course equipment, toiletries or the occasional attempt at having a life have even entered the picture.

And then there's the washing…

In university accommodation while wifi, utilities, gym membership might be included, tenant students may have to pay separately for communal laundry facilities. A few pounds here and there might not sound like much. But when you're paying a high rent already, stretching one pot of money across an entire term, every extra charge adds up.

And then you graduate…

You might reasonably think that the student who borrowed the most will necessarily repay the most. Student loans don't quite work like that.

The repayment plan depends on the system you're funded by. So our four students can graduate from the same university having studied the same course but find themselves on different repayment plans.

For 2026/27, the relevant undergraduate plans have different income thresholds before repayments begin. The amount you repay isn't determined simply by the balance you borrowed; it's also about which repayment plan you're on and how much you earn.

Annual income above which graduates repay 9% of earnings above the threshold, 2026/27.

A Scottish graduate (Plan 4) doesn't start repaying until earning nearly £9,000 a year more than an English graduate (Plan 5) on the exact same salary, a difference that has nothing to do with how much either of them borrowed, and everything to do with which nation they're from.

Same degree. Same salary. Different repayment rules.

But this isn't quite the end of the story…

There's another layer which doesn't appear in our table. And this is where things get particularly interesting for anyone who has ever administered university hardship funding.

The university support or hardship funds

The national student finance system is the first layer. University financial support can provide a second, discretionary layer.

Historically, many university hardship schemes still have their roots in the historic Access to Learning Fund (ALF). ALF was introduced in 2004, replacing previous hardship loan and grant arrangements, and ran for around ten years before central funding was withdrawn in 2014.

The old system used an income-assessment approach which broadly looked at what a student was expected to have available and what they reasonably needed. When central funding disappeared, universities were left to decide how they would provide their own support.

If the national system provides one student with less baseline support than another, a university hardship assessment may bridge some of that gap. Though should the university be expected to top up the statutory funding schemes of the devolved nations that pay their applicants less?

University support may sometimes help a student who is struggling. But funds are limited so some students are prioritised above others.

A university hardship fund is not an automatic top-up to student finance. It's often a mix of non-discretionary (matching student's circumstances to set fund criteria) and discretionary elements. Students normally have to apply, demonstrate a financial need and meet the university's own fund criteria.

Different universities have different schemes, different budgets and sometimes different assessment rules.

Ask early!

Your university's Student Money Adviser, Student Support Service or equivalent can tell you what extra help exists and whether you're eligible to apply. Do apply early, as demand can mean funds become depleted or even run out.

Four systems. One cost of living.

We often talk about “the student maintenance loan” as though there is one national system and one national experience. As we can see, there isn't.

There are four different systems. Four different approaches to grants and loans. Different income thresholds. Different repayment plans. Different amounts of support.

Students from all four nations can end up sitting in the same lecture theatre, paying the same rent, buying the same food and wondering why their friend seems to have a completely different student finance package and more money.

It's not necessarily because one student is being treated unfairly (though do check with a Student Money Adviser as funding errors do happen). It's because they're being assessed under different national systems.

A final Levitate thought…

Student finance isn't just about the amount written on the award letter. It's about what that money has to achieve in real life.

Rent. Food. Travel. Course costs. Laundry, Socialising etc. Also the unexpected expence you hadn't budgeted for. The week when everything seems to need paying at once. The end of term and your loan payment has nearly all gone but it's weeks till the next installment is due.

And sometimes, despite doing everything right, the numbers simply don't stretch.

That's when knowing where to look for help matters.

We'll be looking at university hardship funding in a separate Levitate Student article, including where the old Access to Learning Fund model came from, how hardship assessments have developed, and whether our ideas about which students are financially vulnerable have kept pace with the evidence.

Instead of asking: “How much student finance do I get?”

It might be better to ask: “What is my student financial support actually supposed to achieve and how can I make up any shortfall?”

Figures correct as of 20 September 2026, for the 2026/27 academic year, all assessed at £25,000 household income for comparability. Rates and thresholds change annually so always check the current-year figures before relying on any amount in this post. Primary sources:

gov.uk: Student finance: how you're assessed and paid 2026 to 2027 (England)

gov.wales: Rates of undergraduate student support 2026 to 2027 (SFWIN 02/2026)

saas.gov.uk: Full-time undergraduate funding (Scotland)

studentfinanceni.co.uk: 2026/27 Full Time Guide to Financial Support (PDF)

If your circumstances involve previous study, dependants, disability, or a different living situation from the profile above, your entitlement will differ from every figure in this post, speak to your university's Student Support/Advice Service before relying on any of these numbers for your own decisions.