Ch-ch-changes!


Alternative Student Finance (Sharia-Compliant Loans) — Where Things Currently Stand

Back in December 2016, in a post about a school careers fair, we touched on a question a student had raised: is a UK student loan compatible with Islamic law? Nearly a decade on, it's worth a proper update, because both the underlying problem and the government's proposed fix have moved on since then. 

The history — and it's more specific than “interest changed at some point”

Under Islamic law (and we are not experts) our understanding is money creating more money through interest (riba) is problematic, which is why student loan interest has long concerned some Muslim students and families. As we noted back in 2016: before 2012, student loan interest was set at RPI only, and the Muslim Council of Britain guided in a very short statement (much quoted at Open Days) that seemed to imply because the loan only grew in line with the cost of living, this wasn't necessarily problematic. That changed in 2012, when new loans (Plan 2) introduced interest of RPI plus up to 3% while studying, a meaningfully different proposition, and the point at which that earlier guidance stopped clearly applying.

Students starting from 2023 onwards (Plan 5 loans) accrue interest at RPI only again with no extra percentage on top. That's arguably closer to the original pre-2012 structure the Muslim Council of Britain assessed as not necessarily problematic and yet we haven't found any updated public guidance from them, or similar bodies, revisiting the question considering that change. This looks like a gap between a live policy change and public religious guidance.

What the government is doing instead of revisiting old guidance

Since 2014, government has been consulting on and developing a purpose-built alternative: Alternative Student Finance (ASF), based on the Islamic finance principle of Takaful which is a group-based mutual support rather than a commercial loan. Students would receive funding for tuition and living costs from a ring-fenced Takaful fund; after graduating, they'd make contributions back into that fund, calculated to match what they'd have repaid on a conventional loan, so there is in the government's own words “no detriment nor advantage” either way. It would be independently certified as Sharia-compliant by the Islamic Finance Supervisory Board.

The 2016 white paper that followed the original consultation said this product would be available to everyone not restricted to Muslim students, leading to the bigger question below.

When does it actually arrive?

Still no firm date. ASF must structurally “mirror” the incoming Lifelong Learning Entitlement (see our previous update), and government has said ASF cannot launch before LLE is in place. That means it inherits every LLE delay, plus whatever delays are specific to ASF itself. A decade-plus of consultation and “in development” is worth bearing in mind before treating any date as settled.

The bigger question

Strip away the religious framing, and ASF's mechanics, income-contingent contributions, collected through the tax system, into a collective fund, with no individual debt attached, looks a great deal like a graduate tax. Sector analysts, particularly Wonkhe, have made exactly this point, and it raises a fair question: if a tax-collected, contribution-based model is judged workable for one group of students, why run two structurally different systems designed deliberately to produce identical financial outcomes? It's a genuine, unresolved debate rather than a settled one, arguments for keeping them separate tend to be about political sensitivity and limiting the mutual-fund structure to where it's actually required for religious compliance; arguments the other way point to duplicated administration and a decade of delay for an option that needed the most care.

Trusted sources on this

     GOV.UK — Alternative student finance — the official position and how it's meant to work

     House of Commons Library — Sharia-compliant alternative student finance : independent background and the full delay timeline since 2013

     Wonkhe — “A graduate tax is coming after all. For Muslim students” : the analysis behind the question above

     Islamic Finance Council UK : secretariat for the certification process

This page first grew out of a conversation at a school careers fair in December 2016:  see our original post: Supporting Moor End Academy Careers Fair.

We'll update this page again as a firmer timeline for ASF emerges. Last updated: [August/2026].






The Lifelong Learning Entitlement — Where Things Currently Stand

Turn and face the strange... Welcome back to Ch-ch-changes, where we track the bigger shifts in UK student finance and support as they happen, because policy doesn't wait for a tidy announcement, and neither should you.

We're kicking this off again with the Lifelong Learning Entitlement (LLE), arguably the biggest structural change to English student finance in over a decade, and one that only 12% of the adult population currently knows is coming. If you're a student, a parent, or an adviser, it's worth understanding now rather than in January 2027 when it actually bites.

 

What is it?

The LLE replaces the current undergraduate student finance system and Advanced Learner Loans (levels 4–6) in England with a single, credit-based entitlement. Every new learner gets funding equivalent to four years of post-18 education, currently £38,140, based on 2025/26 fee rates and usable up to age 60. Instead of one continuous three-year course, you can draw on it flexibly: a full degree, or shorter modules spread across a working life. It also scraps the old rule blocking funding for a second qualification at the same level, which matters if you're retraining.

When does it actually start?

This is the part that trips people up. “2026/27” doesn't mean business as usual from this September:

     Applications open from September 2026

     But only for courses and modules starting from January 2027 onwards

     Anything starting before 1 January 2027 stays on the current system, start to finish

What's covered at launch

Not everything, yet. At launch it covers full courses at levels 4–6 (degrees, Higher Technical Qualifications, some distance learning), plus modules of high-value technical courses, and level 6 modules tied to government-identified priority skills areas. It isn't yet a “spend it on any module you like” system.

Worth watching

A few things flagged by sector commentators in particular Wonkhe, who've tracked this closely since it was first announced:

     The list of approved providers won't be confirmed until summer 2026, after applications open, making early research difficult

     The rollout has already slipped more than once since its original 2025 target

     The initial offer leans on providers taking on financial risk against genuinely uncertain student demand and research suggests real appetite for this kind of flexible learning is mixed

     Postgraduate study isn't included

     Credit transfer between institutions is still unresolved, with a consultation not expected until early 2026

Trusted sources to follow this

     GOV.UK : LLE guidance for providers  ~ the official line, updated as details firm up

     The Education Hub: What the LLE means for you  ~ DfE's plain-English version

     House of Commons Library briefing ~ independent, thorough, tracks the delays

     Wonkhe  ~ exceptional sector analysis and the most reliably critical eye on this

     Office for Students:  modular provision and the LLE ~ regulatory detail

We'll keep this page updated as the picture becomes clearer. Last updated: [August/2026/].





Changes Archive article below


December 2016

English University undergraduate tuition fees to rise for all students from academic year 2017/18

Read amendment regulations here

Read related press articles - Independent 
                                             BBC News


October 2016

Department for Education confirms that EU students starting a higher education course in September 2017 will still have access to funding.

Read the press release - here

September 2016

Welsh Government announce yesterday (27/09/2016) the outcome of Professor Diamond's review of student funding for Higher Education students who are domiciled in Wales.

Read the full report here - The Diamond Review


July 2016

Jo Johnson MP Minister of State for Universities and Science today announced changes to the Tuition Fee cap and loan amounts for English and Wales domiciled Higher Education students as the Higher Education and Research Bill progresses pending the introduction Teaching Excellence Framework.

Read all the details HERE 

June 2016

Postgraduate Student Loans

The Education (Postgraduate Master's Degree Loans) Regulations 2016 come into force on 16th June.

Apply here from late June

See also 
Factsheet on Postgraduate Loans 
May 2016 Edition of Exchange
Quick Guides on Postgraduate Loans


Long Residence  

Amendement to the Education (Student Fees. Awards and Support) Regulations 2016 come into force on 6th June.

The amendements create a new category of eligible student in the Education (Student Support) Regulations 2011


(3) In Schedule 1, Part 2 (Eligible Students – Categories) 


“Long Residence 13.—(1) A person who on the first day of the first academic year of the course— 
(a) is either— 
(i) under the age of 18 and has lived in the United Kingdom throughout the seven-year period preceding the first day of the first academic year of the course; or 
(ii) aged 18 years old or above and, preceding the first day of the first academic year of the course, has lived in the United Kingdom throughout either— (aa) half their life; or (bb) a period of twenty-years; 
(b) is ordinarily resident in England; 
(c) has been ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom and Islands throughout the three-year period preceding the first day of the first academic year of the course; and 
(d) subject to sub-paragraph (2), whose residence in the United Kingdom and Islands has not during any part of the period referred to in paragraph (c) been wholly or mainly for the purpose of receiving full-time education. 
(2) Paragraph (d) of sub-paragraph (1) does not apply to a person who is treated as being ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom and Islands in accordance with paragraph 1(4).”

This change is particularly important to young people who have lived in the UK for a long periods but are still subject to immigration control. Many young people have passed through UK schooling and yet reach the stage when they should be entering higher education but have been prevented from doing so by the robust residency criteria requirements. This change to the regulations in Engalnd and Wales will open access to higher education for some of these students.


May 2016

White paper - Changes Afoot

Changes in Higher Education are all part and parcel of the sector but for the uninitiated it can all seem very bewildering and as if the players are all speaking in a secret code. Today Jo Johnson MP Minister of State for Universities and Science delivered the White Paper - Success as a knowledge economy: teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice .  A higher education bill will follow later this week.

Many prospective students and their families may find it tough to understand the various media perspectives and worry what to focus on. To help  the fabulous wonkhe shared their expert insight in concisely reporting the days events and response with more considered analysis to follow.

When you work in HE it is common to play "bingo" with all the terminology, acronyms, theories and theses. Levitate Student rather liked the comment by Emran Mian of the think tank Social Market Foundation

“Higher education is too much like a club where the rules are made for the benefit of universities. These reforms will begin to change that. Students will have access to more information when they’re making application choices; and universities will be under more pressure to improve the quality of teaching"

Certainly it can seem like a club where many staff and students don't even feel like fully signed up members even if they are paid up. Changes can often result in new students being unclear what they are signing up for.

Levitate Student is interested in money and consumer matters first and foremost. What we know from the changes on that front is that the current £9,000 fee cap will be subject to change from 2017. The level to which the fee charge can rise will be linked to teaching quality. This will serve to counter the stance taken by the unis when they were allowed to offer a "variable fee" and the majority opted to charge the maximum irrespective of their reputation, quality or league table slot. Universities will now face more regulation, requiring them to be more open and transparent about data sharing particularly regarding quality and students outcomes and destinations. They will also need to be comfortable with any new providers entering the market competing for their customers. Fees rising will displease many who fight for education for all as a right and would wish to see no tuition fees.

Fee levels will be allowed in some case to rise with inflation, linked to the Retail Price Index (rather than the Consumer Price Index) which is better for the universities purses than the student's.

In 2016/17 the Maintenance Grants (see Maintenance Grants RIP) are to be removed from the funding package in England and so the total burden of student loan is set to increase even more for future students. A niggle of doubt is a system of loans (not grants) would be easier to off load by Government in the future to private lenders. Come what may the sector is moving further and further away from non-repayable grants to support those from lower income backgrounds. Lets see how the devolved governments adjust their funding provision in time, will they follow England lead or take their own stance?

We share the hope expressed by Les Ebdon the Director of Office for Fair Access 

“I welcome the increased emphasis on fair access to higher education in this important White Paper. Making sure that talented people from disadvantaged backgrounds are able to access – and succeed – in higher education is key to increased social mobility"

We like the potential for more mobility within programmes of study to include the potential to transfer more easily between institutions. This will help students with changes of circumstances and hopefully those students whose confidence builds from the point of admission. More customer choice is always welcomed though not if the resulting award is regarded as sub-standard so it will be interesting to see how this option develops. Also the new HE providers will have no track record of success and freedom to move from a poor provider is limited by the number of years of funding entitlement. Needing to repeat elsewhere because a course wasn't up to standard will only mean a wasted year of funding.

The photographed government document leaks referring to "marginalised students" does cause a doubt as to whether the hope is that these "challenger" providers are considered an option for the "marginalised". Don't worry if you are not deemed suitable for Oxbridge....you can always study at Facebook Central......
We would rather the so called "marginalised", were less so and supported through fair access to the institution of choice based on ability.

Alex Neill, Director of Policy and Campaigns at Which?  said

“We welcome measures to give students more insight into student experience, teaching standards and value for money. These proposals could not only drive up standards, but could also empower students ahead of one of the biggest financial decisions of their lives."

We share this view and welcome the shift that alternate private providers must register with The Office of the Independent Adjudicator . We would like responsiveness to complaint handling improve and time scales for resolution reduced considerably. 

 Which reported that many universities fail to meet requirements set by the Competitions and Markets Authority with respect to how students are treated as customers. Universities do have a long way to go yet in delivering holistic, institution wide customer service excellence.

Our biggest niggle of all is not having the certainty anymore that the system a student signs up for won't be subject to significant change after they are locked in. 

March 2016

EU students - changes to residency rules

On March 1st 2016 Joe Johnson MP (Minister of State for Universities and Science) announced a significant planned change to the Education (Student Support) Regulations 2011 which will change the residency requirements for EU national students.

Currently an EU national is entitled to apply for

  • Tuition Fee Loan only if they come to UK to study in Higher Education
  • Tuition Fee Loan and Living Cost Support (currently loans and grants) if they have lived in UK for 3 years prior to the start of their course.
  • Tuition Fee and Living Cost Support if they are a EEA Migrant Worker or Family Member of a Migrant Worker
The proposal is to increase the residency requirement from 3 years to 5 years before an EU national can be eligible for the living cost support in their student finance package.

The government cite the increasing pressure on the student finance budget due to the level of EU applicants and their desire to manage the burden on the tax payer as their reason for the change. The changes will impact students starting a new course in academic year 2016/17.

Many EU nationals of course fall into the category of an EEA Migrant Worker and pay taxes themselves to the UK. These changes will not affect the entitlement of Migrant Workers and their families according to the statement. Neither will it affect "those who are already studying". 

If you are an EU national living in England and thinking of starting a Higher Education course please seek advice on this change before starting the course.

It will be interesting to see how the devolved government and assemblies of Northern Ireland, Scotland an Wales respond to this change and whether they follow suit. 

Useful information and guidance is available through UKCISA

January 2016

So much is happening in the Student Money world at the moment! It’s always dynamic and it can be tricky working out what applies to you, what and why it matters anyway, and should you care?

Here is quick breakdown on recent rumblings from our perspective with a few links to help out.

In his Autumn Statement on 25th November 2015 Chancellor George Osborne set out his spending review and covered much of it in his speech. Some of which grabbed the headlines, in particular his change of stance on Tax Credits for working families.

There was plenty in George's statement that significantly impacts students and, though it failed to make his speech, it didn’t go unnoticed; as covered, for example, in this article from the Independent - Government faces legal threat over controversial plan to make students pay £6,000 extra on loans

So what was the fuss about?

Changes to the Student Loan Repayment Term and Conditions    

Back in 2012 the Government made some changes to student finance for Higher Education Students who live in England and began their course from Sept 1st 2012. The main headlines changes were


Raising the maximum tuition fee an institution could charge to £9,000

  &

Introducing a real rate of interest on the student borrowing


At the time there was a furor as the Liberal Democrats, who where then in a coalition government with the Conservatives, had made pre-election promises to remove Tuition Fees for HE students - not to increase them. It was a change of stance that hit Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg hard and, rightly or wrongly, dogged him till the next election.

The changes to the way interest would be applied meant that the government could no longer suggest the student loans were not really interest bearing. Previously the rate of student loan interest was linked to the Retail Price Index. This link was used to suggest that the student loans were not truly having interest applied, but that the balance was simply rising in line with inflation. The government tried to reassure Muslim students where their faith prevents the paying of interest that the student loans linked to RPI “do not attract interest in the commercial sense”. The 2012 changes made this more complex and problematic for Muslim students and it is an issue we will return to in a later blog.

The Conservative arm of the coalition offered some appeasement to the Lib Dems in the shape of the very short lived National Scholarship Programme. News of the NSP shot up like a rocket firework, but even as the promises of its three year financial commitment to help students from lower income backgrounds brightened the skies, rumours of its pending demise were already circulating around university upper echelons.

Martin Lewis (him off the TV and of Money Saving Expert fame) was recruited to lead a Taskforce to ensure students were not discouraged from applying for Higher Education courses because of the 2012 funding changes. Other organisations such as the National Union of Students and the National Association of Student Money Advisers joined forces with him. They did a good job, and still do, in making sure students are well informed and don’t have to rely solely on government websites.

There was much focus placed on the so called “progressive” nature of the new system, in that it would be the higher earners paying more back into the public purse beyond graduation.

In addition the spotlight was placed on the new loan repayment threshold, which was increased from a post study income of £15,000 to £21,000 per year for the post Sept 2012 entrants. This meant a student under the 2012 system could earn more before having to start repaying their loan.

Vince Cable Secretary for Department of Business Innovation and Skills at the time said in a Ministerial Statement on 8th December 2010

‘As announced on 3 November, that income threshold will be £21,000 as from 2016, compared with the current threshold of £15,000. Our modelling to date has assumed that that threshold should be uprated every five years in line with earnings. In order to give better protection for those on lower incomes, we now propose that the uprating should instead be made every year. Around a quarter of graduates will be better off in this new, more progressive regime than under the current regime.’

Similarly from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills document FAQs regarding the 2012 student finance changes published in 2011:

Q I’m worried that I’m going to be saddled with a lifetime of debt as a result of the changes
A You don’t have to pay anything back until you are earning more than £21,000 a year. The £21,000 earnings threshold will be increased

There were rumblings that the folk at the Dept BIS might have got their maths wrong. Worries were voiced that the return on the new system of funding might not bring enough pennies back into the public coffers to be cost effective. These worries were dismissed.

So back to Mr Osborne’s Autumn Statement 2015, buried in the text he had this to say regarding a Freeze to the Student Loan Repayment Threshold:

2.76 To reduce government debt, the student loan repayment threshold for Plan 2 borrowers will be frozen until April 2021. The discount rate applied to student loans will be revised to 0.7% above RPI, to bring it into line with the government’s long-term cost of borrowing. Taken together, this will reduce the government’s estimate of the long-term student loans subsidy to around 30%

What?? Is this an attempt to retrospectively make up for getting those sums wrong? Or pick on students to cover losses from the tax credit U-turn? Whatever the reason this is pretty unprecedented, changing the repayment terms once a student has signed up to the system! Substantive changes have historically only affected new cohorts of students so at least they have opportunity to make an informed choice about signing up. Given the loan has a 30 year term, then the potential for future changes to the terms and conditions is rather worrying.

The government consulted on the “Freezing the student loan repayment threshold” and the outcome was published on 25th November. Only 5% of the respondents were "for" the proposal of “ Keeping the threshold of £21,000 the same for all post-2012 borrowers until April 2021”, yet the Chancellor has still gone ahead.

Mr Lewis was not happy and he is well known enough to help throw a super trouper on the matter, writing an open letter to the Prime Minister and promising to fund some students to take the matter to judicial review.

You will be affected by these changes if you started a HE course in September 2012 and took the student loan for fee and/or living costs from Student Finance England.

It will be an interesting story to follow.

The proposed removal of Maintenance Grants for students funded by Student Finance England.

Grants are elements of the student finance package that are non-repayable. Historically they have meant that many students especially from lower income backgrounds could afford to study in higher education. The maintenance grant currently makes up part of the living cost support for student from households with income under £42,620. The lower the household income then the more the living cost support is made up of grant (down to a lower household income threshold of £25K).

The Government plans to remove the maintenance grant from the package of support for students domiciled in England and starting a Higher Education course from September 2016. This will mean that the core living cost support will be a student loan only.

In our experience of talking to students and their families it is those from lower income backgrounds that are more averse to taking on the student debt. Certainly the changes will mean students from the lower income backgrounds are more likely to graduate with higher levels of student debt. The government no doubt will argue that the level of debt is not the issue but what you repay. That the system is geared to ensure the higher earner repay more after graduation and that those from lower income backgrounds are not disadvantaged. They may argue that evidence from the Office for Fair Access shows that more students from lower income background are going to university than ever, undeterred by the higher fees, and their heads not turned from their institution of choice by monetary incentives such as bursaries or fee waivers.

The changes are outlined in Statutory Instrument Education (Student Support) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 (S.I., 2015, No. 1951). As a so called negative instrument, it could become law without a debate on the matter in the House of Commons. Perhaps they hoped no one would notice?

The NUS noticed and have been very vocal shouting out for a debate. There has also been a petition circulating on social media and opposition MP’s have tabled motions to ask for a debate on the matter.  All this noise appears to have been successful in bringing about a parliamentary debate scheduled for Tuesday 19th January.  

So it will be interesting to see how all this goes and whether the Education (Student Support) (Amendment) Regulations 2015 (S.I., 2015, No. 1951) is annulled or proceeds into legislation.

Changes to funding for NHS Courses

Proposals to change funding for students on NHS HE courses also featured in the Autumn Statement. This is complex issue and warrants a blog entry of all its own which we will post later this week.